How does utilitarianism conflict with justice

That is clearly how bentham supports.Assign an absolute priority to the avoidance of suffering.Utilitarianism was created by european philosophers jeremy bentham and john stuart mill throughout the late eighteenth and nineteenth century.These make sense when they serve the public good, but either noxious or unclear on their own.The 1970s saw a wave of attacks on utilitarianism and consequentialism, favouring theories of good government based on contract, whereby what was good followed from what was right, rather than vice versa.

A theory of justice must be arrived at which goes beyond government allocations of property titles, and which can, therefore, serve as a basis for criticizing such allocations.Mill argues for the latter.While this objection is a common one, i believe that it is mistaken.In module two we introduced some of the dominant narratives of justice, including the welfare, freedom, and justice models.Utilitarianism in the justice system.

Mill contends that there are two components to justice.Utilitarianism is a philosophy that values the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people (driver 2014).But none of this makes justice any less important, or makes it the same as expediency.A standard objection to utilitarianism is that it could require us to violate the standards of justice.Hence, actions are judged based on their consequences.